interior banner image

‘Touch’ by Henri Cole

‘Touch’ by Henri Cole

Author: Michael Klein

December 13, 2011

Can something true but unbearable happen out of the sense of wonder?  Is one addicted to the gaze that follows curiosity, however morbid?  I kept thinking about this idea while reading Henri Cole’s new book of poems, Touch.  What exactly constitutes wonder?  Is it casual, ordered, instinctual?  Is it considered wonder only when it ends in bright revelation?  Many of Cole’s self-flagellating, mostly non-sonnet sonnets (14 lines, but otherwise in and out of a strict traditional form) all lean to the darker side of the bright revelation wonder might be. These are somber, autobiographical formal-like lyrics that encounter dread and occasional joy the way a jeweler enters a watch and they are – most of them – beautifully rendered as most of Cole’s poetry has been these last few years.  He has, I think, become a master.

While the book is not as surprising as his previous book, Blackbird and Wolf (my choice for the best book of poems published in 2008), Touch is a quiet and powerful companion and continues in the autobiographical vein that has distinguished Cole’s last four books from the ones published at the beginning of his career.  He has been coming out in these recent books:  sexually, autobiographically and formally informally in terms of how he lets the poems hit the page:  there’s more space between the lines and the poems stand as single stanzas resembling—but more, reassembling—the sonnet.

Cole’s concern in much of this latest work has been going one-on-one with figures in an autobiography that feels transcribed partly from the dream world and partly from the actual world.  Every personal triumph involves seeing his people for what they’ve made themselves become as well as staring directly into his own pathos – not always the abyss, but not entirely lit at the edges, either.  In a gesture that feels self-referential, Cole quotes from Auden in the frontispiece to the last section of the book:  to be free/is often to be lonely.  And so, Touch is about autobiographical loneliness but it is also about the loneliness of open spaces, and most notably and at times, surprisingly, the loneliness (or is this nobility?) of the animal world.  While the mother figure is here and the lover (drug addled and narcissistic in the wrenching poems that make up the last section of the book) is also here, the book has many animals observed in acts of change, breaking free.  The loneliness of being free is proximate to something wild.

Sometimes the animal is also totem for the family and in the echo of that totem’s presence there almost always follows a scene from human domestic life.  From his poem “Shrike”:


Poor cricket can hardly stand the whistling,

not to speak of the brownish-red pecking

(couldn’t you go a little easy?), but holds up

pretty good in a state of oneiric pain.

Once, long ago, when they were quarrelling about money,

Father put Mother’s head in the oven.


Animals speak variously and specifically to Cole and his praises of them are some of the strongest poems in the book:


Poor patient pig – trying to keep his balance,

that’s all, upright on a flatbed ahead of me,

somewhere between Pennsylvania and Ohio,

enjoying the wind, maybe, against the tufts of hair

on the tops of his ears, like a Stoic at the foot

of the gallows, or, with my eyes heavy and glazed

from caffeine and driving, like a soul disembarking…


And of course, the kingdom from which he speaks is key to the unconditionals:  love, patience and gratitude.  Animals, though totem, are also spirits that have been made visible.  From “Hairy Spider”:


…Soon it will storm

and all of them will drown.  Still, I love to watch their web changing,

like this year’s words for this year’s language, not didactic,

but affective, while absorbing the secret vibrations from the world…


But, perhaps the key to Touch is located is the surprisingly titled “Carwash”:


            In the corridor of green unnatural lights/recalling the lunatic asylum, how can I/defend myself against what I want?


Henri Cole wants everything, not only the way I think many dialectic poets want everything (the argument with oneself and the world never ends), but also the way an addict wants everything.  Marie Howe speaks to the predicament – is it soul sickness? – in her poem “What The Living Do”:  “….We want the spring to come and the winter to pass. We want/whoever to call or not call, a letter, a kiss – we want more and more and then more of it.”

I’ve been reading the poems of Henri Cole for a long time and love the way they have enlarged and grown more intimate from book to book.  Blackbird and Wolf dealt in many ways with the bigger world and these newer poems deal with a much smaller world:  easier to hold but more slippery.  At moments, life itself is almost more powerful observed than it is actively encountered.  In one poem, he says:  The horses were so beautiful but the people/ugly.  Why is that? Both seemed perfectly alive.  By observing life, I don’t mean to imply the poems are static (every great poet sees living as much as she feels alive), but they are not ecstatic poems, either.  They have, in the end (with the delicacy of a compass needle), stopped at somewhere between ecstasy and dread – where, as it happens, much of living is.


Henri Cole
Farrar, Straus and Giroux
Hardcover, 9780374278359, 80pp
September 2011

Michael Klein photo

About: Michael Klein

Michael Klein has won two Lambda Literary Awards for poetry and taught writing at Sarah Lawrence College, City College of New York, Binghamton University.  He is currently a faculty member in the MFA Program at Goddard College. His latest book of poems is "then, we were still living" ( which was a Lambda finalist, and his new book of poems, "The Talking Day" will be published in 2013 by Sibling Rivalry Press.

Subscribe to our newsletter